Discussions on controversial issues in food animal agriculture were incorporated into NC State University’s Introduction to Animal Science Lab. Student (n=136) perceptions were evaluated through pre- and post-lab surveys collected over two years with responses on a Likert scale ranging from “not at all” (score 1) to “very much” (score 5). Three topics increased in score (P<0.01): “How aware are you of the current issues facing animal agriculture?” (3.06 pre to 4.17 post), “Can you describe the difference between animal rights and animal welfare?” (3.58 to 4.55), “Do you consider the US food supply to be safe, wholesome and nutritious” (3.41 to 3.87). Following the discussion, students indicated their understanding of what constitutes poor animal husbandry changed (3.75, SEM=0.09) and they had a better understanding of how animal agriculture interacts within the environment (4.22, SEM= 0.07), antibiotic usage in animal agriculture (4.29, SEM=0.08), and hormone usage in animal agriculture (4.27, SEM= 0.08). Some responses differed by gender (understanding of animal rights vs. welfare) and by college in which the students were enrolled. Based on student responses, this discussion format was determined to be an effective and worthwhile addition to this introductory level course.